Let be a field and be a nonconstant polynomial in . We already know that we can find a field extension of that contains a root of . However, we would like to know whether an extension of containing all of the roots of exists. In other words, can we find a field extension of such that factors into a product of linear polynomials? What is the “smallest” extension containing all the roots of ?
We will use mathematical induction on the degree of . If , then is a linear polynomial and . Assume that the theorem is true for all polynomials of degree with and let . We can assume that is irreducible; otherwise, by our induction hypothesis, we are done. By Theorem 21.5, there exists a field such that has a zero in . Hence, , where . Since , there exists a splitting field of that contains the zeros of by our induction hypothesis. Consequently,
The question of uniqueness now arises for splitting fields. This question is answered in the affirmative. Given two splitting fields and of a polynomial , there exists a field isomorphism that preserves . In order to prove this result, we must first prove a lemma.
Let be an isomorphism of fields. Let be an extension field of and be algebraic over with minimal polynomial . Suppose that is an extension field of such that is root of the polynomial in obtained from under the image of . Then extends to a unique isomorphism such that and agrees with on .
If has degree , then by Theorem 21.13 we can write any element in as a linear combination of . Therefore, the isomorphism that we are seeking must be
,
where
is an element in . The fact that is an isomorphism could be checked by direct computation; however, it is easier to observe that is a composition of maps that we already know to be isomorphisms.
We can extend to be an isomorphism from to , which we will also denote by , by letting
.
This extension agrees with the original isomorphism , since constant polynomials get mapped to constant polynomials. By assumption, ; hence, maps onto . Consequently, we have an isomorphism . By Proposition 21.12, we have isomorphisms and , defined by evaluation at and , respectively. Therefore, is the required isomorphism (see Figure 21.33).
Let be an isomorphism of fields and let be a nonconstant polynomial in and the corresponding polynomial in under the isomorphism. If is a splitting field of and is a splitting field of , then extends to an isomorphism .
We will use mathematical induction on the degree of . We can assume that is irreducible over . Therefore, is also irreducible over . If , then by the definition of a splitting field, and and there is nothing to prove.
Assume that the theorem holds for all polynomials of degree less than . Since is a splitting field of , all of the roots of are in . Choose one of these roots, say , such that . Similarly, we can find a root of in such that . By Lemma 21.32, there exists an isomorphism such that and agrees with on (see Figure 21.35).
Figure21.35.
Now write and , where the degrees of and are less than the degrees of and , respectively. The field extension is a splitting field for over , and is a splitting field for over . By our induction hypothesis there exists an isomorphism such that agrees with on . Hence, there exists an isomorphism such that agrees with on .